ER 3.9 Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings

    The Standard

    The purpose of ER 3.9 is to preserve the integrity of valid legal processes; to permit a decision-making body to rely on the integrity of submissions made to it; and to preserve expectation that lawyers will treat legislature and administrative agencies that deal with them as they would deal with courts.

    The Limitation

    Lawyers have no exclusive right to appear before nonadjudicative bodies, as they do before a court, yet the ethical rules only apply to lawyers.  This may subject lawyers to higher standards in these cases than laypersons.

    FAQs

    What does ER 3.9 require?

    Compliance with and conformance to: ER 3.3(a) through (c), Candor to the Tribunal; ER 3.4(a) through (c), Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel; and ER 3.5, Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal.

    Why doesn’t ER 3.9 incorporate ER 3.1, which requires that a lawyer make only meritorious claims and contentions?

    As one commentator put it: “in politics, it is standard operating procedure to design arguments that appeal to emotion and may not necessarily follow the rules of logic.”  Rotuna and Dzienkowski, Legal Ethics – The Lawyer’s Deskbook on Professional Responsibility §3.9-3.

    This page is managed by Patricia Seguin

    suggestion, or problem with our website?