ER 3.7 Lawyer as Witness

    The Standard

    A lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which the lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness.  The prohibition is geared toward eliminating confusion about the lawyer’s role.  When a lawyer takes on both roles, jurors are likely to be confused about “whether a statement by an advocate-witness should be taken as proof or as an analysis of the proof.”  ER 3.7, Comment [2].

    The Limitations

    A lawyer can act as advocate and witness if: (1) the testimony relates to an uncontested issue; (2) the testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or (3) disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on the client.

    Under 3.7(b), a lawyer may act as advocate in a trial in which another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is likely to be called as a witness unless precluded from doing so by ER 1.7 or ER 1.9.

    FAQs

    My client has the right to choose counsel and that should take precedence over any prejudice the other side is claiming from my serving as both advocate and witness, right?

    Not necessarily.  The court must balance these interests.  See Security Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 332, 334 (1986).  Because the rule deals with the administration of justice rather than a specific client’s individual interest, the client cannot waive the lawyer’s disqualification.

    What does it mean that the lawyer is “likely to be a necessary witness?”

    This means more than a “mere declaration that the lawyer will be called as a witness.”  Security Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. at 355.  A motion to disqualify “must be supported by a showing that the attorney will give evidence material to the determination of the issues being litigated [and] that the evidence is unobtainable elsewhere.”  Cottonwood Estates Inc. v. Paradise Builders, 128 Ariz. 99 (Ariz. 1981).  If the lawyer’s intended testimony is irrelevant, immaterial, cumulative, or can be obtained from other sources the lawyer is not a necessary witness.”  Douglas Richmond, Lawyers as Witnesses, 36 N.M. L.Rev. 47, 52 (2006).

    May I act as counsel in pretrial matters even if I’m disqualified or likely to be disqualified as counsel at trial?

    Yes.

    May I handle the appeal?

    Yes.  ABA Informal Op. 89-1529 (Oct 29, 1989).

    This page is managed by Patricia Seguin

    suggestion, or problem with our website?