Ethics Q&A
Q: Can a lawyer serving as a trustee in bankruptcy directly contact parties in bankruptcy cases who are represented by counsel?

A: Yes. A lawyer serving only in the capacity of trustee does not "represent" any party to the matter and does not have an "interest" in the case or in disputes that arise in the case. Read Ariz. Op. 03-02.



A Golden Career

Read the words of a lawyer who has worked in his practice for 69 years. He speaks of his cases, large and small, and gives suggestions for achieving satisfaction in law and life. Read the article.



Now Available - Client Care Guide!
Help your clients understand the basics of working with an attorney. Order the Bar's revised version of the Client Care Guide.



| Disclaimer | Feedback |
| About eLegal |

Get the Latest on the New UTC Rules
Anyone who drafts trusts, acts as or advises trustee or does fiduciary litigation should attend this day-long seminar on October 3 to learn the very latest on the new Uniform Trust Code rules. Seminar info.


AzbarMail: Learn more about new e-mail service for members only.

Legal Links

Lawyer Jobs Available

Classifieds

Legal Dictionary

Legal Resources

Expert and Consultant Directory

Member Benefits

AZ Foundation for Legal Services and Education

 


In which format would you like to receive this eNewsletter in the future, plain text or text w/graphics? Check the appropriate box below:

Text w/Graphics(HTML)

Plain Text

UNSUBSCRIBE:
You are receiving this message because the State Bar of Arizona believes you will benefit from this information. If you would like to unsubscribe to this mailing, please click here.

Justice Criticizes Minimum Sentencing
Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer says mandatory minimum sentences are unfair and take away flexibility needed in the judicial process. Read more...

Law Schools Sue Pentagon Over Recruitment
A group of law schools is suing the Department of Defense, alleging its requirement that law schools allow military recruiters on campus violates the First Amendment. Read more...

9th Circuit Sides With Gay Ex-Serviceman
The 9th U.S. Circuit reinstated a lawsuit by a former Air Force doctor ordered to pay back his medical school expenses after revealing he is gay. Read more...

 

Chat with the Bar President
Here's your chance to ask questions of the State Bar President without ever leaving your desk. On October 22, members can "chat" with Pam Treadwell-Rubin through the Bar's new online service: AzbarChat. This new feature is another service the Bar provides, All for You. Read more.

Bar Sponsors Free Legal Advice Day
To help celebrate National Health Care Decisions Week, the State Bar is looking for attorney volunteers to participate in a Free Legal Advice Day on October 23 to provide citizens with free legal advice in the areas of probate and trust. Read More

There's Still Time to Volunteer
Would you like to serve on a municipal court judicial selection advisory board? This and other professional volunteer opportunities exist now, but you must apply by November 3. Read more.

Arizona Court of Appeals
Division One Division Two

September 16, 2003 - SA 03-0085 - AZ Independent Redistricting v. AZ Minority
Do the members of the Arizona Redistricting Commission possess a legislative privilege?
Read opinion...

September 16, 2003 - 2 CA-CR 2003-0027 - State v. Livingston
Whether a traffic stop violates the Fourth Amendment rights of the driver when the officer bases the stop on objective facts that the officer erroneously believes constitute a traffic violation under Arizona law.
Read opinion...

9th Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Bonas, No. 02-50631 (9th Cir. September 17, 2003)
The record does not support the district court's finding of manifest necessity justifying a mistrial, where no evidence showed that jurors were unwilling to put aside their unhappiness at having to serve without pay and discharge their duties as instructed by the court. Read opinion...

Giebeler v. M&B Assocs., No. 00-17508 (9th Cir. September 15, 2003)
The Fair Housing Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. section 3601 et seq., required apartment owners reasonably to accommodate a tenant's disability by assessing individually the risk of nonpayment created by his specific proposed financial arrangement, rather than inflexibly applying a rental policy that forbids co-signers. Read opinion...