Q: Which former employees of an opposing party can you talk to without the consent of opposing counsel?

A: All except 1) those whose acts or omissions gave rise to the action; or 2) those who have an ongoing relationship with the former employer. Lang v. Superior Ct., 170 Ariz. 602, 608-609 (App. 1992).
See Ariz. Op. 00-05 for more information



Public Lawyer Roundtable
Public lawyers work hard enough. But then we put them through our latest magazine roundtable! Read the successes and challenges of four public lawyers.
Read more...


Arizona Attorney Magazine wins two awards...Read more...


Buyer's remorse is not limited to purchases of consumer electronics and automobiles. Many clients also experience second thoughts about the lawyer they just hired. Here are a few ways to reassure your new clients.
Read more...



| Disclaimer | Feedback |
| About eLegal |
T-Shirt Sales Support Wildfire victims

Profits support local volunteer lawyer Programs
Read More and order your shirt.

Discover free and fee-based sources to find and investigate expert witnesses. Learn expert search strategies and discover cost effective research tips. Follow the search for an actual expert through a hypothetical case..
(Course Number: 50146-356)


Legal Links

Lawyer Jobs Available

Classifieds

Legal Dictionary
(powered by FIndLaw)

Legal Resources

Expert and Consultant Directory

Law For Kids

AZ Foundation for Legal Services and Education

 


In which format would you like to receive this eNewsletter in the future, plain text or text w/graphics? Check the appropriate box below:

Text w/Graphics(HTML)

Plain Text

UNSUBSCRIBE:
You are receiving this message because State Bar of Arizona believes you will benefit from this information. If you would like to unsubscribe to this mailing, please click here.

Court hears gaming challenge
A challenge to Arizona's Indian-gaming law needs to proceed even though voters will get the chance in November to determine the shape of future gambling compacts, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was told Monday.
Read more...

Medical Marijuana and 3 casino issues to top ballot in November
Arizona voters will have 14 ballot issues to ponder in the Nov. 5 election. They include three questions related to casino gambling, medical marijuana, and whether to deny bail to people accused of child molestation.
Read more...

Supreme Court overturns speech restraints on judicial candidates
The Supreme Court struck down limits on what some judicial candidates may tell voters, a landmark free-speech ruling that could heat up court campaigns around the country.
Read more...


Veteran Lawyer, Judge to Lead Bar’s Lawyer Regulation
Robert B. Van Wyck, a former Coconino County Judge and veteran lawyer, is the new head of the State Bar of Lawyer Regulation Department. Read more...

Arizona Attorneys Offer Free Legal Advice to Wildfire Victims
The State Bar of Arizona is coordinating free legal assistance for people directly impacted by the Rodeo-Chediski wildfires in central Arizona. Read more...
Attorneys: How to volunteer.

Supreme Court Committee Recommends New Litigation Program
The Supreme Court of Arizona’s Complex Litigation Study Committee is inviting comment from the Bar and Bench on a new litigation program that allows civil litigants the opportunity to have one judge preside over their case from initial filing to completion.
Read more...

Arizona Court of Appeals – Division One

July 2, 2002 - CV 01-0492 - ADOC v. State of Arizona Personnel Board
On administrative review, may the Personnel Board find employee discipline to be "excessive" when it merely believes that lesser punishment would be more appropriate?
Read more...

June 27, 2002 - CR 01-0453 - State v. Schaffer
May a prosthetic device be a "dangerous instrument" within the meaning of the aggravated assault statute, A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(2)?
Read more...

9th Circuit Court of Appeals

July 2, 2002 - No. 00-15635 - Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank
A bank's production of financial records to the U.S. Army, pursuant to an unlawful subpoena (issued in a proceeding under Article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which does not authorize subpoenas), violated the Right to Financial Privacy Act, and the governmental litigation exemption to the Act is inapplicable.
Read more...

July 2, 2002 - No. 00-16867 - Benny v. U.S. Parole Commission
The U.S. Parole Commission's jurisdiction over a parolee is not automatically terminated under 18 U.S.C. section 4211(c)(1), if five years on parole release elapse without an early termination
decision, but a writ of mandamus should issue requiring an early termination hearing and decision.
Read more...